Inspection & audit software

Custom Inspection & Audit Software Development

Salt builds web and mobile inspection software that connects checklists, field evidence, findings, and verification. Use cases include warehouse rack inspections, facility audits, equipment checks, and contractor work verification.

Example use cases

What can we build with inspection & audit software?

These are examples, not a complete list of what we can build. We develop custom solutions around your business process, including use cases not listed here. Delivered client work is identified separately below.

01Warehouse operations

Warehouse rack inspections

Inspection findings and photos are difficult to connect to exact rack locations.

Start with
Rack references, inspection checklists, schedules, and field photographs.
What we can build
Record findings by location and severity, then assign follow-up for verification.
Your team gets
A location-linked inspection report and corrective-action list.

Plan for: Your qualified inspectors define the assessment criteria and severity rules.

Discuss this use case
02Multi-site operations

Facility condition audits

Locations record condition issues in inconsistent formats.

Start with
Site inventories, checklist templates, notes, and evidence photos.
What we can build
Use a consistent checklist and consolidate findings for site and regional review.
Your team gets
Comparable site records with accountable follow-up owners.

Plan for: Agree where a standard checklist is appropriate and where site-specific questions are needed.

Discuss this use case
03Field and maintenance teams

Equipment inspection checklists

Recurring checks are missed or have incomplete evidence.

Start with
Asset identifiers, check schedules, required fields, and inspection instructions.
What we can build
Assign checks, collect the required observations, and flag incomplete submissions.
Your team gets
An inspection history for each asset with unresolved findings.

Plan for: Equipment suitability and safe operating decisions remain with qualified personnel.

Discuss this use case
04Facilities and project operations

Contractor work verification

A completed work status does not show whether the work was checked.

Start with
Assigned work items, completion evidence, and acceptance criteria.
What we can build
Capture evidence and route it to a designated verifier before closure.
Your team gets
An accepted or reopened work record with reviewer comments.

Plan for: Define who can verify work and what evidence is required for acceptance.

Discuss this use case

Don’t see your use case? We can build around it.

Your project can adapt these examples, combine several workflows, or solve a different problem. Tell us what you need to achieve and which systems you use. We’ll define the scope, integrations, and a practical first release with you.

Discuss your workflow

The solution in action

From a daily task
to a connected workflow.

An illustrative flow to make the scope tangible. We adapt the steps, roles, and controls to your business.

  1. 01

    Assign an inspection

    Give an inspector the location, checklist, and due date.

  2. 02

    Record findings in the field

    Attach photos, location details, and a severity rating.

  3. 03

    Verify the follow-up

    Track assigned actions and review evidence before closure.

What we can build

The capabilities behind the workflow.

Structured field capture

Use agreed checklists and location references.

Evidence and findings

Keep photographs, notes, and severity with the issue.

Verification workflow

Separate completing an action from confirming its closure.

Relevant delivered project

Warehouse rack audit & safety system

Salt developed RAMS, a web and mobile application for warehouse rack inspections, safety visibility, and maintenance follow-up.

Explore what Salt delivered
Inside the project
  • Mobile inspection schedules and task tracking
  • Condition views and severity classification
  • Issue verification and maintenance follow-up

Read the project scope and implementation details to assess the fit for your business.

Plan before you build

Agree on the inputs.
Know what success means.

Systems, data & access

Checklists, location and asset structure, severity definitions, device needs, and connectivity constraints. Offline behavior needs explicit scope.

What to measure

Inspection completion, overdue findings, evidence completeness, and time to verified closure.

A focused first release

One location type and inspection checklist, tested with the people collecting evidence.

Delivery with SPARK

Make the next decision with evidence.

Explore the SPARK framework

Define the workflow, test the uncertain parts, and release an agreed scope. Use the pilot to decide what belongs in the next stage.

  1. Agree on the scope. Map users, exceptions, systems, and acceptance criteria.
  2. Test the first workflow. One location type and inspection checklist, tested with the people collecting evidence.
  3. Build and validate. Review working software, access boundaries, and integration failures.
  4. Release and improve. Establish a baseline using the agreed measures and review what users need next.

Before you decide

Questions buyers ask.

Connected expertise

Explore your next step.

Software Development

Let’s define a useful first release

Tell us where the work gets stuck.

Bring your current workflow, the systems involved, and the outcome your team needs. We’ll help identify a practical starting scope.

Discuss your workflow