Warehousing & Logistics
Connect field observations, operational records, and the people responsible for follow-up. Salt builds web and mobile workflows for warehouse and logistics teams that need clearer evidence, ownership, and visibility across locations.
Relevant delivered work
Salt’s warehouse rack audit system connects web and mobile inspection workflows with scheduled checks, findings, photographs, severity ratings, verification, and repair follow-up.
Review the project scope and deliverySolutions for your industry
Combine an industry-specific application with the software, data, or automation capabilities it needs. Each solution can be adapted to your users and systems.
Record checklists, findings, locations, and evidence in a structured field workflow.
Explore the solutionAssign issues, follow repair progress, and verify the resolution.
Explore the solutionExtract agreed references from delivery and shipment documents for review.
Explore the solutionShare approved requests, updates, and completion evidence with external teams.
Explore the solutionExample applications
These are illustrative project scopes, not a complete list of what we build or claims that every example has been delivered. Bring us your own workflow—even if it is not listed.
Assign an inspection, capture findings against rack locations, and attach photographs and the agreed severity rating.
A structured inspection record and an accountable follow-up list.
Plan for: Qualified personnel define inspection criteria and interpret findings; software does not certify physical safety.
Turn a finding into assigned corrective work, collect repair updates, and route completion evidence to a verifier.
A traceable record from the original issue to accepted closure.
Plan for: Keep repair completion and independent verification as distinct states where required.
Receive delivery documents, extract shipment references, and route unclear or mismatched records for review.
A searchable document record linked to the relevant shipment or order.
Plan for: Agree identifiers, document quality checks, retention, and how disputes are escalated.
Consolidate open findings and work items by site, owner, severity, and age. Allow managers to inspect the source evidence.
An operational backlog view for prioritizing follow-up across locations.
Plan for: Use consistent status and severity definitions before comparing sites.
Make the scope practical
Bring the people who own the workflow, the data, and the receiving systems into the first scoping conversation.
Identify the warehouse or transport system interfaces and the location, asset, order, and shipment identifiers needed. Scope a bounded data exchange instead of assuming a full platform replacement.
Review the devices, photo capture, barcode needs, and expected connection quality. Offline operation requires explicit local storage, synchronization, conflict handling, and device access requirements.
Agree who records findings, assigns corrective work, accepts completion, and can reopen an issue. Define required evidence and retain a clear event history for operational review.
Start at one location with one checklist or corrective-work process. Test it with field users, their actual devices, and realistic connection conditions before expanding to other sites.
Track inspection completion, missing evidence, overdue findings, time to assignment, and verified closure. Evaluate operational efficiency without treating software adoption as proof of fewer safety incidents.
Engineering behind the solution
A defined project or managed team can take an agreed workstream forward. Dedicated engineers fit when your team already leads delivery.
Web apps, mobile apps, and business software built around the way you work.
Connected data, dependable reporting, and dashboards your team can actually use.
Practical testing that helps your team find problems before customers do.
Modernize applications, improve cloud delivery, and integrate DevOps and DevSecOps.
Agree your US time-zone overlap, decision owners, review cadence, repository access, and acceptance criteria before delivery begins. Define ownership, handover, and post-launch support in the proposal and agreement.
Compare engagement optionsBefore you choose a partner
Offline capture can be included after defining devices, records needed on-site, photo storage, synchronization, and conflict resolution. It should be tested under realistic connection conditions rather than assumed from having a mobile application.
The proposed workflows can complement existing platforms. Inspection records, corrective work, and document exceptions may need only a narrow integration. A complete warehouse or transport management replacement requires a separate assessment and scope.
Salt’s published rack audit case study describes the web and mobile system, scheduling, photographic findings, severity, verification, and repair follow-up. This is evidence for those operational workflows, not a claim of implementing every type of logistics platform.
An external-user workflow can be scoped with access limited to assigned locations or work items. Define what vendors can update, which evidence they must submit, and who inside your organization accepts completion.
We assess the first-release scope, existing systems, data readiness, access requirements, review responsibilities, and testing needs. Those dependencies inform the proposed milestones, team, and estimate. A bounded pilot can resolve uncertainty before a wider rollout.
Your industry. Your workflow.
Describe the inspection or follow-up workflow, the locations and users involved, and any mobile, connectivity, or integration requirements.
